I will be happy observe eHarmony answering within their official weblog to articles named “Marriage-Maker states Are Tied in Knots ” through the Wall Street log. The WSJ article examines a few of the wedding statistics introduced by internet dating sites like eHarmony in addition to the methodology regularly estimate these types of research. We spoke somewhat do you put in beans to prevent gas about this topic at the same time, a few weeks ago whenever original WSJ article was published (see Story).
The WSJ article failed to turn to kindly on statistics launched by adult dating sites, and for the most part we agree with the writer. Anyone ought to understand exactly how these data are created. Of the many online dating sites pointed out inside WSJ post, “eHarmony stands apart as among the list of a lot more mindful ones”. It is not exactly a glowing report for eHarmony thus, they made a decision to upload a reply on their weblog.
Inside the eHarmony post each goes into more details on the way they calculated that their particular dating internet site had been responsible for 2percent of marriages in the us, through the 12-month duration closing March 2007. The vast majority of details we already understood about from a previously revealed PDF document named “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 wedding Metrics range eHarmony Marriages” (see Story), nevertheless article really does clean out a few more details. What this web site blog post does program is, eHarmony is trying become as open and clear through its analysis findings as is possible. I do believe title “start correspondence” may undoubtedly end up being your best option for all the formal eHarmony weblog.
Here is the full eHarmony a reaction to the Wall Street log about how precisely they calculate their unique wedding statistics. For further information about this dating internet site, read all of our report on eHarmony.